Open dataset v1
The Case Study 01 relational dataset: 52 decisions, 37 matters, pseudonymized, with a data dictionary, controlled vocabularies and a confidence score on every extracted field. A silent field is recorded as silent, never as zero. Release accompanies the case study; the dataset page will host the download.
The corpus-gap registry
What each source can see: CanLII publishes decisions but prohibits automated collection and lists no file numbers on its indexes. A2AJ, Canada's leading open-legal-data project, holds the full federal CHRT corpus — and no HRTO, and no Ontario Divisional Court. Tribunals Ontario posts quarterly volume CSVs at predictable URLs that are not listed in the Ontario Data Catalogue. Applications that never produce a decision appear in no public source at all. Canada's open-legal-data infrastructure cannot see Ontario's human rights record — that is a finding, not a footnote.
The ledgers and the gap
What changed / where it went
Eighteen years of narrowings, beside the money spent resisting accountability. Two phones.
R·35The public-interest gap
The claim nobody is allowed to bring — and our formal request that the Commission bring it.
R·NRNamed, then removed
Where the individual respondents go. Eleven removed from one cluster; zero personal findings in eighteen years.